Tips for success on your path to tenure

In 2002, I made a significant career change. After an amazing decade working in public health at the Texas Department of State Health Services as a microbiologist and molecular epidemiologist, I rejoined my alma mater, Texas State University opens in new tab/window, as an assistant professor in the Clinical Laboratory Science (CLS) Program opens in new tab/window.

I had been teaching microbiology as an adjunct professor at Austin Community College opens in new tab/window for about seven years and decided to throw my hat in the ring for a CLS faculty position by way of recommendation from my former MS advisor.

I remember thinking “I’ll never get the job, but this will be great interview experience.”

And, now, as I often tell my colleagues and students, “If you apply for a job, expect to be offered that job.”

Well, here I sit 13 years later remembering that moment I was offered the job. I remember thinking to myself, “Do I have the academic and research skills to do the job? What does publish or perish mean? What have I done?”

In fact, I often tell new tenure-track hires that I almost turned down this job because of the gut-wrenching anxiety I had about going on a six-year interview that is known as tenure.

Think about that: every year, I would have an evaluation tracking my progress towards tenure and promotion (T&P) benchmarks. These things keep a new assistant professor up at night and always “worrying and wondering” about the path to success.

When I decided to leap in to the deep end of the academic pool, I immediately started to network and talk to successful colleagues across multiple disciplines to gain an understanding as to what I needed to be doing to be successful in the T&P game. I quickly learned that the path to T&P is often a confusing journey riddled with hurdles and potholes. And often, only vague and broad guidelines are available.

One of my favorite phrases I used to read in multiple publications or policies is “quality and quantity” of research products. That’s right; tell me what that means to a public health microbiologist like me brand new to academia. Is it three, five or 10 articles to make T&P? Or does it only mean four publications if I can get published in Cell, the New England Journal of Medicine or The Lancet Infectious Diseases? Should my publications be sole-authored, and if there are multiple authors, how important is it for me to be the lead author? What if I need to not publish quickly because I feel I have some type of intellectual property (IP) that needs to be kept confidential, but, in doing so I am not publishing soon enough? Do I need to get grant funding, and how much is enough?

What about the famous three areas regarding T&P – Teaching, Scholarship and Service? Are they weighed equally? Can I be a horrible teacher if I’m a research star? Can I neglect my department, college, or university service if I teach a heavy workload or write winning grants for millions of dollars?

While contemplating these thoughts (often in the middle of the night when I was worried about my next publication letter of acceptance or rejection), I decided that I would start a diary of notes and tips of my trip down the T&P hairpin loop road – all the while under constant scrutiny at multiple levels. I did a similar diary journal while working on my PhD during my T&P employment that offered tips and secrets for those going to graduate school.

In 2008, I made tenure and promotion to associate professor and subsequently I was successful at obtaining full professor in 2012. The crazy thing about this time was I also went back to school to complete a PhD and I became a Chair of the CLS Program opens in new tab/window in 2013. Additionally, I was chosen to serve as the Associate Dean for Research opens in new tab/windowin my College of Health Professions opens in new tab/window. During these very busy times, I had the honor of being asked to serve my university in the Faculty Excellence Workshops which have the purpose of mentoring new faculty hires, including tenure-track faculty. It was at this time around 2011 that I brushed off my notes and tips for T&P and created my own document for these individuals.

Basically, each January I and other Associate Deans for Research attend one or more of the Faculty Excellence Workshops and lead breakout sessions with new T&P faculty. I take my tips document as a handout and I’ve found that so many new faculty, regardless of their academic or employment background, share the same fears and concerns that I had in 2002 and during my T&P journey. The feedback has been very gratifying. Comments are usually like “this is so helpful to hear and see actual examples of how you navigated this process, or, I can’t believe you would share your documents and advice so freely.”

What follows is the very document that I’ve edited, shared for comments, and polished each year when talking to new faculty. I hope as you read this story, you will be inclined to offer your own comments about this sometimes “behind the curtain” process of T&P.

So, let’s start with the foundation of the primary three areas – teaching. Most new assistant professors have never been taught how to be teachers! Yes, many of us have advanced degrees, and we may have served as graduate or teaching assistants, but rarely have we had actual theory and practice in how to teach. Crazy, right? Read on.

How to shine at scholarship and research productivity

1. If you recently completed your dissertation/thesis, publish it as a book manuscript or multiple journal articles, including your university affiliation so it clearly counts towards tenure immediately at your place of employment – not where you may have obtained your PhD; continue to mine your dissertation for publishable materials.

2. Establish your own research projects. If you continue to work in the area of your doctoral research, maintain collaborative projects with your dissertation chair, but also begin to do your own collaborative research and expand your network.

3. Maintain the pipeline! Research is a journey not a single destination. Always have projects you are “working on,” submitted, in review, in press, and coming to completion. Look for new projects and collaborators on and off campus. Talk to other professors about their research-you never know how new collaborations can develop.

4. Squeeze all the research products possible out of each project and grant proposal! Often the background sections of proposals can be used for summary articles in peer reviewed publications. Don’t waste these efforts. One of my most highly cited articles was a proposal background section.

5. Don’t overlook data mining with federal or state agencies, including the military. These agencies often have tons of data that need to be analyzed and published. Establish a working relationship and offer your help with publishing because they are typically understaffed and publishing is not often a priority for them. This may be one of my “hidden gems” regarding tips for publication. Since I worked for a decade with DSHS and did two visiting internships with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), I became astutely aware of this opportunity. While my public health colleagues are amazing, they often are too busy chasing the next outbreak or event to publish. Establish connections with your state and federal departments of health, agriculture, education, etc., and ask to publish data sets they don’t have time for. Here are some examples of publications I coauthored with my colleagues opens in new tab/window.

6. See if your institution has a grant program for faculty. At Texas State, our Research Enhancement Program (REP) is an excellent source of seed funds for pilot projects. Ask to see a successful proposal from your college. Think in terms of “How can I build on this project to look for external funds?”

7. Large grants are outstanding, but don’t overlook smaller opportunities, such as state contracts, professional organization grants, SBIR /STTR, corporate equipment offers (laboratory equipment, etc.), foundations, etc. to help build your research profile.

8. If you are new and trying to establish a research record, you will have more success if you start small and build on your successes by slowly escalating the size of your awards. Many young professors have failed to get the mega-grants and spiraled down to a failed tenure bid because they refused to start small. Establish your reputation and build on it with publications and successful grant awards. Don’t overestimate your status in your academic community. Many of my early publications were case studies or projects I had established in my work with DSHS and CDC.

9. Ask to see successful grant applications from colleagues. Get colleagues to review your proposal drafts and learn from them. Writing a grant is not like writing a publication!

10. Involve your students in research – undergrads and graduate students. There are funds for incorporating this into your research agenda. Often student involvement increases the probability of getting an award, and it’s a great way to build a network of future collaboration with successful students. Here are a few papers I co-authored with students: Rohde, RE, Denham, R, and Brannon, A (Summer, 2009). Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Nasal Carriage Rate and Characterization in a Texas University Setting opens in new tab/window, Clinical Laboratory Science (Summer 2009); Garcia, SA, McKenzie, JF, Patterson, T, and Rohde, RE: Snapshot Prevalence and Characterization of Staphylococci, including MRSA, in a Student Athletic Facility: An Undergraduate Research Project opens in new tab/window,” Clinical Laboratory Science (Summer 2009).

11. When rejected for publications or grants, sulk for a bit, have a cold adult beverage — then get over it. Don’t take it personally! Read the reviewers’ comments carefully and learn from them.Always treat reviewers (directly or indirectly) like they have done you a big favor – because they have. The more critical and detailed the review, the bigger the favor. Glowing reviews on a failed proposal are useless.

12. Rewrite and resubmit failed proposals by directly addressing the criticisms of the reviewers. Successful proposals are often submitted two or three times before they are awarded. Do not give up.

13. As you have time ☺, try to sit on a review panel to learn how successful proposals are written.

14. Likewise, find peers and mentors inside (or external) your college and department that are successful at publishing research – and, learn from them. Offer to do the “grunt work” on a project to get on the publication.

Don’t underestimate the importance of service

1. Don’t be a disappearing act. It’s common to hear tenured professors, chairs, deans or your upper administration tell new faculty to “not overload yourselves with service” during the first few years of your tenure track appointment. In many ways this is good, solid advice. However, you should be collegial in your primary department or unit environment. Think about assisting with “close to home” duties in your department or college. Remember, many of these close colleagues will be on the personnel committee of college review group that evaluates your T&P annual packet. So, don’t be a disappearing act when it comes to pulling your own weight. Our provost likes to say if there are five people in your department, then try to do 1/5 of the service. I agree – and, I would personally tell new faculty to not be afraid to serve more when it makes synergistic sense for their research and networking capital.

2. Look for committees that actually interest you. It’s OK to volunteer for something you might find helpful and fun, versus being assigned – especially if it intersects with research interests or puts you into collaborative research relationships. For example, I sat on the university’s Animal Care and Use Committee as my college representative. Zoonotic disease is in my public health background, so the committee led to collegial efforts and networking for my research. I can’t begin to tell you the benefits I gained by networking with other university researchers in the zoonotic and infectious disease area at my institution. I still take advantage of those relationships.

3. Talk to others who can help you find committees that will not dominate your time – and avoid chairing a committee the first few years. Chairing a committee can be a lot of work and will decrease your scholarship productivity, a very bad idea if you don’t have tenure. (It will be a good idea when you begin thinking about full professor, as leadership in service is important at that time.)

4. Keep an eye on how the university and your college view service. There is a movement to place more value on service. This is especially true of those considering full professor. Is it important if you become president of your national or state professional organization? If not, then you may want to hold off on external service opportunities until later unless there is a direct benefit to you – like helping you publish or establish grant partners.

5. Learn how the university works. During your first year, read the policies and procedures of your university, Academic Affairs and your college and department. This knowledge will work to your advantage by offering you opportunities to serve on different committees.

Usually, one of the last things a faculty member is concerned about is the process of their materials moving through the confusing maze of committees, the chair or director, dean, provost, president, and finally to the university system level (e.g., the Board of Regents in the US). While, this process can be different across the academic landscape, I put together this step-by-step process that occurs at my university. Of course there can be hiccups and changes, but I think this will help you understand the general process of your T&P materials.

I welcome each of you to this amazing, wonderful, stressful and sometimes ridiculously busy time in your academic journey. Please don’t hesitate to comment with your own helpful tips and stories. I look forward to hearing from you.