Nanotechnologies output and impact
Background information
Over the past two decades, China's overall scientific research capabilities have been rapidly enhanced and has become the world’s leading power. Nanotechnology, as an essential subject, has made breakthrough progress both in quantity and quality. To further promote the development of nanoscience research, as well as recognize the opportunities and challenges in the field of nanoscience, it is essential (for researchers) to be based on the current status of nanoscience research , and to analyze the scope and impact of research outcomes, as well as to conduct horizontal comparison analysis on a global scale.
Nano report
Big Data Analysis of Nanoscience Bibliometrics, Patent, and Funding Data (2000-2019)
Edited by: Yuliang Zhao, Hongjun Xiao, Xingxing He
Discover the newly published Strategic Services Nano OA book, zooming in on the outputs and impacts of Nanoscience
National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, China (NCNST)
National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, China (NCNST), established in December 2003, is co-founded by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and the Ministry of Education as an institution dedicated to fundamental and applied researches in the field of nanoscience and technology, especially those with important potential applications. NCNST is operated under the supervision of the Governing Board and aims to become a world-class research center, as well as public technological platform and young talents training center in the field, and to act as an important bridge for international academic exchange and collaboration.
Analysis objectives and challenges
Evaluate the academic outputs and academic impact of nanoscience
Cross-field and academia-industry analysis
Identify the development factors of nanoscience
Global data comparison, transnational data comparison and analysis
Solutions
Given the strategic significance of Nanoscience and nanotechnology, it is essential to evaluate and predict its developmental trends. This report is based on the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature, Elsevier's Scopus, along with the research evaluation platform SciVal. The funding and patent analysis data for the report is from Funding Institutional and PatentSight, respectively. This report provides an evaluation of Nanoscience's scientific output, role, contribution, and impact through bibliometric analysis, combined with big data indicators of Nanoscience scientific results and patents from 2000 to 2019.
Apply multiple indicators to analyze the effectiveness of data and quantify the scope and impact of research outcome
Identify research topics and research trends around the globe, and help researchers formulate research plans
Utilize global data to conduct differentiated instruction on institutions or individuals.
Recognize the disadvantages and highlight the advantages to understand performance and impact of scientific research
Explore potential partners and P1 candidates
Clarify how research supports practical applications and innovation
Scholarly output
Number and global share of authors with Nano-publications (2000–2019). Source: Scopus
Knowledge flow diagram
Knowledge flow-out diagram of Nano-publications (2015–2019). Source: Scopus
Academic-corporate collaboration
Collaboration network of the most active institutions with academic–corporate collaborations in the world (2015–2019). Source: Scopus
Funding analysis
Nano-related awards’ share (X axis) vs. Nano-publications’ share (Y axis) in each subject (2009–2018). Source: Funding Institutional, Scopus
Patent analysis
The top 10 academic institutions with patent ownership by Patent Asset Index of Nano-related patents (2000–2019). Source: PatentSight
Worldwide academic-corporate collaboration
The top 100 corporate entities by academic-corporate collaborated Nano-publications (2015-2019). Source: Scopus
I have read the draft of the Nano Report, I could say that it is the most informative report of Nano I have ever seen. It is really a wonderful report, showing the innovative power and promotive power of nanoscience to almost all disciplines. These analyses themselves are also full of innovative ideas, different viewpoint, and different visions, comparing with any Nano Reports we have seen before. So, I do appreciate you for this great job.
Yuliang Zhao
Director at China National Center of Nanoscience and Technology