Who Responds to an Adaptive Treatment for Adolescents With Anorexia Nervosa Using Family Based Treatment?: Outcomes From a Randomized Clinical Trial

A studyopens in new tab/window in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP)opens in new tab/window, published by Elsevier, investigated adaptive treatment for Anorexia Nervosa (AN), a serious psychiatric disorder with high morbidity and mortality. The current evidence supports the use of Family-Based Treatment (FBT). However, recovery rates for youth with AN are about 40% with FBT. Improving treatment outcomes in this adolescent age group will save lives, improve health, and prevent chronicity. This study examined the relative efficacy of adding Intensive Parental Coaching (IPC) to standard FBT for those who do not respond by FBT session 4 with adequate weight gain of 2.4 kg, a clinical predictor of recovery at the end of treatment (EOT). 

This study recruited 107 adolescents and their families at two academic medical centers with specialty eating disorder services for youth, of whom 69 did not meet the weight gain threshold indicative of early response. These early non-responding youth were randomized to continue with standard FBT or to receive three sessions of IPC. Participants were adolescents with DSM-5 AN between the ages of 12-18 years; 6.5% were male and 11% were Hispanic. The main outcome was mean body mass index (mBMI) >94% expected for age. Secondary outcomes include change in eating-related cognitions. Adding IPC to FBT improved outcomes only for those youth whose parents demonstrated low parental self-efficacy at baseline.  Baseline parental self-efficacy assessment may be used to identify those families (approximately 25%) most likely to benefit from adding IPC to FBT. However, for most adolescents with AN, it is reasonable to continue with standard FBT even in the presence of an early non-response. Future studies should consider earlier interventions to improve early response rates. 

Author James Lock says of the study, "Finding ways to better match treatments to individual families is an important way to improve outcomes and quality of care for adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa. This study found that additional specialized adjunctive parental coaching is useful, but only for specific families—and importantly those families can be easily identified through a combination of screening prior to treatment and early treatment response." 

AN is a complex mental health disorder, with recovery rates below 50% for the most effective treatments. This study highlights the need for precision medicine in mental health by identifying factors that predict treatment response and enhance the ability to target specific interventions.  

Notes for editors 

The article is "​Who Responds to an Adaptive Intervention for Adolescents With Anorexia Nervosa Being Treated With Family-Based Treatment? Outcomes From a Randomized Clinical Trial​," by ​James D. Lock, MD, PhD, Daniel Le Grange, PhD, Cara Bohon, PhD, Brittany Matheson, PhD, Booil Jo, PhD​ (​https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2023.10.012​). It appears in ​Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry​, volume ​63​, issue ​6​ (​June 2024​), published by Elsevier. 

Copies of this paper are available to credentialed journalists upon request; please contact ​James Lock, MD, PhD; e-mail:,​ at ​[email protected]​.  

About ​​JAACAP​​ 

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatryopens in new tab/window (JAACAP) is the official publication of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. JAACAP is the leading journal focusing exclusively on today's psychiatric research and treatment of the child and adolescent. Published twelve times per year, each issue is committed to its mission of advancing the science of pediatric mental health and promoting the care of youth and their families. 

About Elsevier

As a global leader in scientific information and analytics, Elsevier helps researchers and healthcare professionals advance science and improve health outcomes for the benefit of society. We do this by facilitating insights and critical decision-making with innovative solutions based on trusted, evidence-based content and advanced AI-enabled digital technologies.

We have supported the work of our research and healthcare communities for more than 140 years. Our 9,500 employees around the world, including 2,500 technologists, are dedicated to supporting researchers, librarians, academic leaders, funders, governments, R&D-intensive companies, doctors, nurses, future healthcare professionals and educators in their critical work. Our 2,900 scientific journals and iconic reference books include the foremost titles in their fields, including Cell Press, The Lancet and Gray’s Anatomy.

Together with the Elsevier Foundationopens in new tab/window, we work in partnership with the communities we serve to advance inclusion and diversity in science, research and healthcare in developing countries and around the world.

Elsevier is part of RELXopens in new tab/window, a global provider of information-based analytics and decision tools for professional and business customers. For more information on our work, digital solutions and content, visit www.elsevier.com.