Ready to find out how it works for your institution?
![Contact us](http://images.ctfassets.net/o78em1y1w4i4/6ZSvLgyYzXS1OlFfKPGUYs/d2d05bdfd6dfb22fc70894c7fe0f210f/RDM-contact-us-portrait.jpg?fm=webp&w=654&q=75)
Lamentablemente no somos totalmente compatibles con su navegador. Si tiene la opción, actualice a una versión más reciente o utilice Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome o Safari 14 o posterior. Si no puede y necesita ayuda, envíenos sus comentarios.
Agradeceríamos sus comentarios sobre esta nueva experiencia.Díganos qué piensase abre en una nueva pestaña/ventana
With today’s high level of interest in research integrity, transparency and openness, reinforced by policies sharing this direction, research data is rapidly rising up the agenda and now it’s time for action. Find out how to elevate your research excellence with Elsevier’s Research Intelligence toolset.
Read the whitepaper nowse abre en una nueva pestaña/ventana
Use cases for research trackingse abre en una nueva pestaña/ventana
Discover what the University of Canberra did in response to The Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research which came into effect in 2019 and dictated principles of how data is stored, accessed and shared, and laid the onus of compliance on institutions and individual researchers.
Download the University of Canberra case studyse abre en una nueva pestaña/ventana
The university was tasked with overhauling their research data storage in order to meet new research data guidelines and practices for funders. Scientific Information Specialist Christina Elsenga needed to find a way to track down research data and input into Pure, which is how their work with Data Monitor began.
Read the University of Groningen Case studyse abre en una nueva pestaña/ventana
10 things I wish I had known before my institution introduced RDM
Download the fact sheet for librariansse abre en una nueva pestaña/ventana
6 great reasons you should engage with research data management
Download the fact sheet for researchersse abre en una nueva pestaña/ventana
This work illustrates how clustering of author communities can be improved by using metadata about the authors (such as subject area or institutional affiliation) to supplement network structure based on co-authorship or citation relationships. Using such metadata can improve clustering significantly, both in terms of human interpretability and by allowing detection of smaller groups – but weighting metadata too highly in relation to network structure can be detrimental.