Ready to find out how it works for your institution?

Lamentablemente no somos totalmente compatibles con su navegador. Si tiene la opción, actualice a una versión más reciente o utilice Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome o Safari 14 o posterior. Si no puede y necesita ayuda, envíenos sus comentarios.
Agradeceríamos sus comentarios sobre esta nueva experiencia.Díganos qué piensa se abre en una nueva pestaña/ventana
With today’s high level of interest in research integrity, transparency and openness, reinforced by policies sharing this direction, research data is rapidly rising up the agenda and now it’s time for action. Find out how to elevate your research excellence with Elsevier’s Research Intelligence toolset.
Read the whitepaper now se abre en una nueva pestaña/ventana
Use cases for research tracking se abre en una nueva pestaña/ventana
Discover what the University of Canberra did in response to The Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research which came into effect in 2019 and dictated principles of how data is stored, accessed and shared, and laid the onus of compliance on institutions and individual researchers.
Download the University of Canberra case study se abre en una nueva pestaña/ventana
10 things I wish I had known before my institution introduced RDM
Download the fact sheet for librarians se abre en una nueva pestaña/ventana
6 great reasons you should engage with research data management
Download the fact sheet for researchers se abre en una nueva pestaña/ventana
This work illustrates how clustering of author communities can be improved by using metadata about the authors (such as subject area or institutional affiliation) to supplement network structure based on co-authorship or citation relationships. Using such metadata can improve clustering significantly, both in terms of human interpretability and by allowing detection of smaller groups – but weighting metadata too highly in relation to network structure can be detrimental.