Buy or Build your RIMS — find out which

Votre navigateur n’est malheureusement pas entièrement pris en charge. Si vous avez la possibilité de le faire, veuillez passer à une version plus récente ou utiliser Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, ou Safari 14 ou plus récent. Si vous n’y parvenez pas et que vous avez besoin d’aide, veuillez nous faire part de vos commentaires.
Nous vous serions reconnaissants de nous faire part de vos commentaires sur cette nouvelle expérience.Faites-nous part de votre opinion S’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre
Explore the total cost of ownership for a research information management system.
Proactively managing research information is both increasingly important and increasingly complex. Likewise, so are the number of complicated tools designed to help with effective and efficient management.
When considering these tools, a primary question to answer is whether you should buy a commercial product such as Elsevier’s Pure or build it yourself using available open-source systems.
To help answer this question, we engaged analysts from Knowledge E S’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre to determine the Buy or Build costs.
Buy or Build: An exploration of the total cost of ownership for a research information management system
Download the white paper S’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtreWant to know more about RIMS/CRIS systems? Read our guide: Why you need a Research Information Management System.
Knowledge E S’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre is an independent consulting company with over 20 years of experience working in research information management for organizations unrelated to Elsevier.
They did extensive research into the Buy or Build question. Their results are available in this white paper.
Using Pure shows a significant Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) advantage over do it yourself (DIY) solutions:
Total cost of ownership (TCO) | Build (DIY) | Buy (Pure) |
One-time costs | ||
Small institution | variable* | 2.5 FTE |
Large institution | variable* | 8.0 FTE |
Annual operational costs (1 year) | ||
Small institution | 3.8 FTE | 2.2 FTE |
Large institution | 32.7 FTE | 24.6 FTE |
Annual opportunity costs (1 year) | ||
Small institution | 2.7 FTE | 0.0 FTE |
Large institution | 22.9 FTE | 0.0 FTE |
Total cost of ownership (TCO) | ||
Small institution | 6.5 FTE* | 4.7 FTE |
Large institution | 55.6 FTE* | 32.6 FTE |
Note: Small institution: ≤ 200 research active staff members. Large institution: ≥3000 research active staff members.
* Data for internal software development too variable to include. Actual TCO will be higher. Use RIMS TCO Calculator to compare using custom local estimates.
Based on the research with universities that implemented DIY and Pure solutions, participants reduced their TCO of Pure up to 50% by following these recommendations:
Buy instead of build
Host in the cloud
Prepare before implementation
Implement and roll out in stages
Streamline the upgrade process
Apply best practices from other institutions
You receive many benefits from having a RIMS system. Here are a few examples from Pure customers.
The Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE) in India implemented Pure and made their research visible to a global audience. As the first Pure installation in India, MAHE anticipated unique challenges but discovered that Pure easily met their needs.
RTI International’s move from their DIY solution to Pure provided the right balance of a stable and reliable solution and customization. Partnering their small, empowered internal team with a Pure project manager resulted in a smooth and rapid implementation.
When the Universidad de Monterrey (UDEM) pursued a new direction as a research university, they needed a system to manage their small but rapidly growing research output (~40% increase per year). They selected Pure and, with dedicated implementation support from the Pure team, had a smooth transition.