Universities, societal impact & sustainable development
A closer look for research leaders
Updated: April 15, 2022
Download PDF version of this article 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く
What is societal impact?
If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants.
- Isaac Newton
In 1961, two researchers published articles:
about the discovery of messenger RNA (mRNA). While it took almost 60 years and many, many additional discoveries, those early breakthroughs drove the 2020 development of two SARS-CoV-2 vaccines — one from Moderna and the other from a partnership between Pfizer and BioNTech.
The researchers are standing on shoulders, building on a breakthrough finding with further discoveries until we can vaccinate the global population from succumbing to Covid-19. That is a lot of societal impact.
Increasingly, governments, funders, the community and more, are demanding to understand the value of university research. They want to know that the significant investment into research is going to help people.
Monk et al. (2017) articulated this sentiment well in the article, Five Ways Universities are Organising Themselves to Increase Societal Impact:
For many, universities and higher educational institutions continue to be viewed as elitist and isolated institutions, with little connection to the society, communities and organisations around them. Indeed, universities are large, bureaucratic organisations, and many still operate in this stereotyped ‘traditional’ way. However, at a time when the challenges facing society are increasing in scale and complexity, traditional institutions, from banks to the public service to NGOs, have begun reviewing their roles, in an effort to be more collaborative. Universities are no different. (p. 1)
From the Covid-19 vaccine example, it is evident that there needs to be a balance between what is known as “blue sky” research and applied and translational research. That is, we must strike a balance between fundamental discoveries — such as the existence of mRNA — and applied research — figuring out how to create a vaccine that will work.
Webinar: Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable
Learn more from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
In “Bye, bye blue sky: Part 1: A conversation with Lee Cronin 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く,” an episode of the Research 2030 podcast, Dr. Lesley Thompson, Vice President at Elsevier and former Programme Director at the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), the largest of the seven UK research councils, asked Dr. Lee Cronin, Regius Chair of Chemistry, University of Glasgow:
If you are running this very adventurous, speculative, serendipitous research lab, can you describe the relationship between that endeavor and the work that you do that leads to applied science?
Listen to Dr. Cronin tell us about creating the “Chemputer” 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く which he is using to produce new drugs and research the origin of life — blue sky and applied all in one.
Listen to our podcasts 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く
One of the driving forces behind doing research that leads to new drugs, new medical devices, new engineering feats, or more is when universities collaborate with industry partners. To learn more about this type of collaboration, you can read our University-industry collaboration guide.
Societal impact is a big topic that is spoken about and thought about in many different ways
For example, we will explore some of these topics:
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
University Grand Challenges
“Moonshots”
Times Higher Education (THE) Impact Rankings
What are the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)?
These are a new set of goals to finish work started in 2000 with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The 17 new goals are called Sustainable Development Goals or SDGs.
According to the United Nations 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く:
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015, provides a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future. At its heart are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are an urgent call for action by all countries - developed and developing - in a global partnership. They recognize that ending poverty and other deprivations must go hand-in-hand with strategies that improve health and education, reduce inequality, and spur economic growth — all while tackling climate change and working to preserve our oceans and forests.
Higher education did not play a significant role with the initial 2000-2015 Millennium Development Goals. However, that changed with the 2015-2030 Sustainable Development Goals. Now, universities everywhere are interested in achieving these ambitious goals.
How to demonstrate your societal impact.
There are a lot of ways a university can demonstrate societal impact. For example, when speaking about SDG 6: Clean Water and Sanitation, you have an impact by:
Providing free drinking water to students, staff and visitors
Promoting conscious water usage on campus and in the wider community
Planting landscapes to minimize water usage
A significant way universities show commitment to sustainable development and societal impact is by using their powerful research capabilities in these critical areas. You can also skip ahead to see how Scopus, Pure and SciVal can help you understand your societal and SDG research.
No Poverty 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: End poverty in all its forms
Zero Hunger 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: End hunger, achieve food security and nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
Good Health and Well-Being 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Quality Education 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Ensure inclusive and equitable education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Gender Equality 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
Clean Water and Sanitation 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
Affordable and Clean Energy 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, and modern energy for all
Decent Work and Economic Growth 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Promote sustained and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
Reduced Inequalities 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Reduce inequality in an among countries
Sustainable Cities and Communities 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Responsible Consumption and Production 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
Climate Action 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Take urgent to combat climate change and its impacts
Life Below Water 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
Life on Land: 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat deforestation, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Partnership for the Goals 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
Learn more about SDGs in the RELX Resource Center 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く or by visiting our Sustainability Science Hub.
SDG Academic Hubs
In 2018 the UN established 17 individual SDG Academic Impact Hubs. For example, the University of Pretoria (South Africa) is the hub for SDG 2: Zero Hunger 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く. According to the UN Academic Impact 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く website, they selected the University of Pretoria (UP) because their long-term strategy, known as UP 2025:
[University of Pretoria] is centered on research that addresses societal problems and, in particular, problems faced by Africa as a developing region. It hosts a number of SDG2 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く-related Institutes, Centers and collaborate widely with South African, African and international institutions.
University | Country | SDG |
India | SDG 1: No poverty | |
South Africa | SDG 2: Zero hunger | |
United States | SDG 3: Good health and wellbeing | |
New Zealand | SDG 4: Quality education | |
Sudan | SDG 5: Gender equality | |
Canada | SDG 6: Clean water and sanitation | |
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Energy Policy and Development Centre 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く | Greece | SDG 7: Affordable and clean energy |
Pakistan | SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth | |
Japan | SDG 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure | |
Kenya | SDG 10: Reduced inequalities | |
Brazil | SDG 11: Sustainable cities and communities | |
Costa Rica | SDG 12: Responsible consumption and production | |
Argentina | SDG 13: Climate action | |
Norway | SDG 14: Life below water | |
Iran | SDG 15: Life on land | |
United Kingdom | SDG 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions | |
The new Hub will be announced soon | SDG 17: Partnership for the goals |
What are the Times Higher Education (THE) Impact Rankings?
According to the World Economic Forum 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く, the Times Higher Education (THE) University Impact Rankings 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く are the "world’s first global attempt to document evidence of universities’ impact on society, rather than just research and teaching performance."
The 2021 Impact Rankings included 1,118 universities from 94 countries.
NOTE: Take a deeper look at Elsevier and the Times Higher Education (THE) Impact Rankings.
For more information about THE World University Rankings, please visit our rankings guide.
THE says that, “We use carefully calibrated indicators to provide comprehensive and balanced comparisons across four broad areas: research, stewardship, outreach and teaching.” THE created different measurable objectives for each of the 17 SDGs.
For example, SDG 5 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く: Gender Equality:
Some of the categories break down further. For example, the 27% Research portion breaks down into:
Proportion of a university’s total research output that is authored by women (10%)
Proportion of papers on gender equality in the top 10 percent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
Number of publications on gender equality (7%)
In 2021, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く was ranked #1 by THE for SDG 5. It is a large women’s university established in 1970, and an example of how the Impact Rankings can highlight the significant contributions toward societal impact a university is making.
La Trobe University 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く ranked #2 for SDG 5 in 2021, is a larger research university, and is in the top 100 universities publishing the most gender-related research.
Each university has it's unique strengths and contributions to Gender Equality.
Please go here 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く for a detailed look at all the factors that make up each SDG impact rank.
Overall rank
THE also calculates an overall rank. THE calculates the overall rank based on an institution’s top three SDGs plus SDG 17. Specifically, the weighting is:
SDG 17 accounts for 22% of the overall score
The other SDGs each carry a weight of 26%
In 2022, the University of Manchester had the highest overall rank, which is calculated based on the 3 SDG areas the University ranked strongest in, plus its score in SDG 17, Partnerships for the Goals:
The score was calculated as:
26% of SDG 12 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く
26% of SDG 11 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く
26% of SDG 9 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く
22% of SDG 17 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く
However, THE 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く goes on to say,
The score from each SDG is scaled so that the highest score in each SDG in the overall calculation is 100. This is to adjust for minor differences in the scoring range in each SDG and to ensure that universities are treated equitably, whichever SDGs they have provided data for. It is these scaled scores that we use to determine which SDGs a university has performed most strongly in; they may not be the SDGs in which the university is ranked highest or has scored highest based on unscaled scores.
The Overall Impact Ranking has detractors. Can you add Gender Equality to Life Below Water? And then compare to another institution who is contributing to No Poverty and Zero Hunger?
In a piece written by Cesar Wazen 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く, Director of International Affairs Office at Qatar University 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く called, “Did the overall ranking mess it up? 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く” he raises the point,
Why would you include an overall ranking if you want to highlight the efforts on each SDG, especially as some universities, by the constitution, cannot tackle all #SDGs, or at least 4 as the ranking requires?
Wazen proposes that the Impact Rankings Overall Rank be more akin to the Formula 1 racing point system.
25 pts
18 pts
15 pts
12 pts
10 pts
8 pts
6 pts
4 pts
2 pts
1 pts
Wazen proposes that the Formula 1 style system rewards institutions that perform well in one SDG more than the current system. For example, a university with a great community connection and serves food to those in need, and does significant research into poverty reduction, is ranked high for SDG 2: Zero hunger. 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く The high rank should carry more weight than a university with decent programs across the board, so their overall position is better. That is, Wazen says that high performers should get high benefits in the overall ranking system.
How can I rank in the THE Impact Rankings?
According to THE 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く:
The Impact ranking is open to any higher education institution in the world — THE states that they want this ranking to be as inclusive as possible
It is different from the THE World University Rankings, which includes a minimum publication volume as part of the eligibility criteria — there is no minimum here
If an institution does not provide any data, it will not be ranked
If you would like to take part in the impact rankings email,
There is no participation fee
A university can participate in as many or as few of the SDGs as they want. If they submit only one (or two), THE will evaluate them for a position within that SDG, but not the overall rank.
For eligibility for the overall rank, a university must submit data on at least three SDGs plus SDG 17. If you provide data on more than three SDGs, THE will take the top three best scores for consideration in the overall rank.
Data collection on the SDGs is challenging for an institution. While Elsevier, via Scopus data, provides the research component for each SDG, it is up to the institution to provide the rest.
In “Societal Impact, SDG Research & Universities: A conversation with Professor Aluísio Segurado of University of São Paulo 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く” an episode of the Research 2030 podcast, Fernanda Gusmao of Elsevier asked Professor Aluisio Segurado, Head of Research at the University of São Paulo in Brazil:
Institutions need to provide evidence of the activities they developed that relate to SDGs. How did you gather such evidence? How many people were involved, and from which departments?
How does SDG research fit into the THE Impact Rankings Methodology?
Each SDG has a different methodology to capture the how an institution is contributing to the SDGs.Below is a summary of the methodology for each THE SDG Impact Rank. For more information on the research component for each SDG, please link to it from below.
What are the THE SDG Methodologies?
Research (27%)
Field-weighted citation index of papers related to poverty (10%)
Number of publications related to poverty (10%)
Proportion of all research papers co-authored with low-income countries (7%)
Proportion of students receiving financial aid (27%)
University anti-poverty programmes (23%)
Community anti-poverty programmes (23%)
Research related to hunger (27%)
Proportion of research papers in the top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
Field-weighted citation impact of papers (10%)
Number of publications (7%)
Student hunger (23%)
Proportion of graduates in food sustainability (23%)
National hunger (23%)
Research on health and well-being (27%)
Proportion of research papers viewed or downloaded (10%)
Proportion of research papers cited in clinical guidelines (10%)
Number of publications (7%)
Proportion of health graduates (34.6%)
Collaborations and health services (38.4%)
Research on early years and lifelong learning education (27%)
Proportion of research papers that are viewed or downloaded (10%)
Proportion of research papers in the top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
Number of publications (7%)
Lifelong learning measures (26.8%)
Proportion of first-generation students (30.8%)
Research (27%)
Proportion of a university’s total research output that is authored by women (10%)
Proportion of papers on gender equality in the top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
Number of publications on gender equality (7%)
Proportion of first-generation female students (15.4%)
Student access measures (15.4%)
Proportion of senior female academics (15.4%)
Proportion of women receiving degrees (11.5%)
Women’s progress measures (15.3%)
Research on clean water and sanitation (27%)
Proportion of papers in the top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
Field-weighted citation index of papers (10%)
Number of publications (7%)
Water usage (19%)
Water care (23%)
Proportion of reused or recycled water (12%)
Water in the community (19%)
Research on affordable and clean energy (27%)
Proportion of papers in the top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
Field-weighted citation index of papers (10%)
Number of publications (7%)
Clean energy measures (23%)
Energy use (27%)
Energy and the community (23%)
Research on economic growth and employment (27%)
Proportion of papers in the top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (14%)
Number of publications (13%)
Employment practices (19.6%)
Expenditure per employee (15.4%)
Proportion of students taking work placements (19%)
Proportion of employees on secure contracts (19%)
Research on industry, innovation and infrastructure (11.6%)
Patents (15.4%)
Number of university spin-offs (34.6%)
Research income from industry (38.4%)
Research on reducing inequalities (27%)
Proportion of papers in the top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
Field-weighted citation index of papers produced by the university (10%)
Number of publications (7%)
First-generation students (15.5%)
Students from developing countries (15.5%)
Students and staff with disabilities (23%)
Measures against discrimination (19%)
Research on sustainable cities and communities (27%)
Proportion of papers in the top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
Field-weighted citation index of papers produced by the university (10%)
Number of publications (7%)
Support of arts and heritage (22.6%)
Expenditure on arts and heritage (15.3%)
Sustainable practices (35.1%)
Research on responsible consumption and production (27%)
Proportion of papers in the top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
Field-weighted citation index of papers produced by the university (10%)
Number of publications (7%)
Operational measures (26.7%)
Proportion of recycled waste (27%)
Publication of a sustainability report (19.3%)
Research on climate action (27%)
Proportion of papers in the top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
Field-weighted citation index of papers produced by the university (10%)
Number of publications (7%)
Low-carbon energy use (27%)
Environmental education measures (23%)
Carbon neutrality (23%)
Research on life below water (27%)
Proportion of papers in the top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
Field-weighted citation index of papers produced by the university (10%)
Number of publications (7%)
Education related to aquatic ecosystems (15.3%)
Supporting aquatic ecosystems (19.4%)
Water-sensitive waste disposal (19.3%)
Maintaining a local ecosystem (19%)
Research on life on land (27%)
Proportion of papers in the top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
Field-weighted citation index of papers produced by the university (10%)
Number of publications (7%)
Education related to land ecosystems (23%)
Supporting land ecosystems (27%)
Land-sensitive waste disposal (23%)
Research (27%)
Proportion of papers in the top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
Field-weighted citation index of papers produced by the university (10%)
Number of publications (7%)
University governance measures (26.6%)
Working with government (23.2%)
Proportion of graduates in law and civil enforcement (23.2%)
Research (27.1%)
Proportion of academic publications with co-author from developing country (13.55%)
Number of publications that relate to the 17 SDGs (13.55%)
Relationships to support the goals (18.5%)
Publication of SDG reports (27.2%)
Education on the SDGs (27.2%)
Italian authors from 2020 and 2021 about SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く (per Scopus)
Benchmark the top 5 European institutions by scholarly output for SDG 2: Zero Hunger 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く (per SciVal)
Filter the researchers by their associated SDGs to find potential partners and more
Download PDF version of this article 新しいタブ/ウィンドウで開く
References
Monk, J., Rim, S. J., & Pulford, L. (2017). Five ways universities are organising themselves to increase societal impact (Rep.). Retrieved March 4, 2021, from Social Innovation Change website.
Chankseliani, M., & McCowan, T. (2021). Higher education and the Sustainable Development Goals. Higher Education,81, 1-8. doi:doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00652-w