주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

귀하의 브라우저가 완벽하게 지원되지 않습니다. 옵션이 있는 경우 최신 버전으로 업그레이드하거나 Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome 또는 Safari 14 이상을 사용하세요. 가능하지 않거나 지원이 필요한 경우 피드백을 보내주세요.

이 새로운 경험에 대한 귀하의 의견에 감사드립니다.의견을 말씀해 주세요 새 탭/창에서 열기

Elsevier
엘스비어와 함께 출판
Embracing AI for evidence-based clinical decisions
Article

Embracing AI for evidence-based clinical decisions

2024년 4월 25일

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are not new to the clinical setting. However, the burgeoning inclusion of generative AI has started to make an increased impact in the industry and pique the interest of forward-thinking clinicians.

Although there’s strong promise with AI technologies in healthcare in a variety of applications, using AI for evidence-based decision making can help with pressing issues that clinicians face. With medical knowledge doubling every 73 days1, clinicians struggle to keep up with the overwhelming amount of medical information that is being published, making it more difficult and time consuming to find resources to support their treatment decisions. Additionally, patient conditions are more complex due in part to an aging population and a growing number of patients with multiple comorbidities. Looking up potential conditions, factoring in these complexities, from multiple sources on top of an already busy workload takes time that many clinicians don’t have. AI technologies have been seen as a way to increase efficiency and are weaving their way into the clinical workflow process, but they have yet to effectively solve the problems clinicians face when it comes to decision making. With the recent launch of ClinicalKey AI 새 탭/창에서 열기, clinicians who have used the product were able to interact with the conversational search engine to find answers to their pressing clinical questions. Elsevier conducted a survey and interviews2 with these users who gave feedback on the usability, responses, and time savings that were offered from ClinicalKey AI. 새 탭/창에서 열기

ClinicalKey AI survey response

Embracing AI for evidence-based clinical decisions

Download full article here  새 탭/창에서 열기

1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116346/ 2 Interview included 30 participants, interviews included 5 participants

ClinicalKey AI: Trusted content. Powered by responsible AI.