Buy or Build your RIMS — find out which
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5d69/e5d69a01180cbfb7827200e32947b6f2a8339d42" alt="Illustrated people reviewing analytics"
Infelizmente, não oferecemos suporte total ao seu navegador. Se for possível, atualize para uma versão mais recente ou use o Mozilla Firefox, o Microsoft Edge, o Google Chrome ou o Safari 14 ou mais recente. Se não conseguir e precisar de suporte, envie seu feedback.
Gostaríamos de receber seu feedback sobre essa nova experiência.Diga-nos sua opinião abre em uma nova guia/janela
Explore the total cost of ownership for a research information management system.
Proactively managing research information is both increasingly important and increasingly complex. Likewise, so are the number of complicated tools designed to help with effective and efficient management.
When considering these tools, a primary question to answer is whether you should buy a commercial product such as Elsevier’s Pure or build it yourself using available open-source systems.
To help answer this question, we engaged analysts from Knowledge E abre em uma nova guia/janela to determine the Buy or Build costs.
Buy or Build: An exploration of the total cost of ownership for a research information management system
Download the white paper abre em uma nova guia/janelaWant to know more about RIMS/CRIS systems? Read our guide: Why you need a Research Information Management System.
Knowledge E abre em uma nova guia/janela is an independent consulting company with over 20 years of experience working in research information management for organizations unrelated to Elsevier.
They did extensive research into the Buy or Build question. Their results are available in this white paper.
Using Pure shows a significant Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) advantage over do it yourself (DIY) solutions:
Total cost of ownership (TCO) | Build (DIY) | Buy (Pure) |
One-time costs | ||
Small institution | variable* | 2.5 FTE |
Large institution | variable* | 8.0 FTE |
Annual operational costs (1 year) | ||
Small institution | 3.8 FTE | 2.2 FTE |
Large institution | 32.7 FTE | 24.6 FTE |
Annual opportunity costs (1 year) | ||
Small institution | 2.7 FTE | 0.0 FTE |
Large institution | 22.9 FTE | 0.0 FTE |
Total cost of ownership (TCO) | ||
Small institution | 6.5 FTE* | 4.7 FTE |
Large institution | 55.6 FTE* | 32.6 FTE |
Note: Small institution: ≤ 200 research active staff members. Large institution: ≥3000 research active staff members.
* Data for internal software development too variable to include. Actual TCO will be higher. Use RIMS TCO Calculator to compare using custom local estimates.
Based on the research with universities that implemented DIY and Pure solutions, participants reduced their TCO of Pure up to 50% by following these recommendations:
Buy instead of build
Host in the cloud
Prepare before implementation
Implement and roll out in stages
Streamline the upgrade process
Apply best practices from other institutions
You receive many benefits from having a RIMS system. Here are a few examples from Pure customers.
The Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE) in India implemented Pure and made their research visible to a global audience. As the first Pure installation in India, MAHE anticipated unique challenges but discovered that Pure easily met their needs.
RTI International’s move from their DIY solution to Pure provided the right balance of a stable and reliable solution and customization. Partnering their small, empowered internal team with a Pure project manager resulted in a smooth and rapid implementation.
When the Universidad de Monterrey (UDEM) pursued a new direction as a research university, they needed a system to manage their small but rapidly growing research output (~40% increase per year). They selected Pure and, with dedicated implementation support from the Pure team, had a smooth transition.