很遺憾，我們無法支援你的瀏覽器。如果可以，請升級到新版本，或使用 Mozilla Firefox、Microsoft Edge、Google Chrome 或 Safari 14 或更新版本。如果無法升級，而且需要支援，請將你的回饋寄給我們。
我們衷心感謝你對這個新體驗的回饋。告訴我們你的想法 打開新的分頁／視窗
Discover what researchers and clinicians around the world think about the use of AI in their work.
The rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has brought with it a wave of expectations, opportunities and concerns in all sectors. In research and health, the promise of accelerated discovery, increased output and improved patient care is matched by an expressed need for transparency, trust and quality content.
Our report Insights 2024: Attitudes toward AI brings together the views of nearly 3,000 researchers and healthcare professionals around the world. Their feedback reveals a clear appetite for adopting AI tools in their work, but also shows differing attitudes among respondents from the world’s top three research-generating countries, the US, China and India.
Researchers and clinicians recognize the growing potential of AI tools, and if they’re not already using them, most expect to do so in the coming two to five years.
94% of researchers and 96% of clinicians think AI will help accelerate knowledge discovery
87% think it will help increase work quality overall
85% of both groups believe AI will help free up time to focus on higher value projects
Respondents were clear that if the benefits of AI tools were to be realized, the tools themselves must be based on high quality, trusted content.
71% expect generative AI dependent tools’ results be based on high quality trusted sources only
If AI tools are backed by trusted content, quality controls and responsible AI principles, 89% of researchers would use such tools to generate a synthesis of articles, while 94% of clinicians said they would employ AI to assess symptoms and identify conditions or diseases
If organizations are to benefit from AI tools, they will need to understand the factors that build researchers’ and clinicians’ trust in AI tools, and their comfort using them.
95% of researchers along with 93% of clinicians believe AI will be used for misinformation
86% of researchers and 85% of clinicians believe AI will cause critical errors, while a similar ratio expressed concern about AI leading to weakened critical thinking
79% of clinicians and 80% of researchers believe AI will cause disruption to society
In the latest of our annual reports looking at the future of healthcare, clinicians have growing optimism about the capability of AI to increase their productivity, freeing up their time for high value work. However, this is accompanied by caution about AI’s impact on critical thinking and clinical decision making.
Key insights:
26% of clinicians have used AI for work purposes
96% of clinicians believe AI will help accelerate knowledge discovery
88% of clinicians believe AI will help increase work quality overall
82% of physicians believe AI has the potential to cause critical errors or mishaps
在這項針對研究界對人工智慧態度的綜合分析中，受訪者期望人工智慧能對他們的工作產生更大的影響，使他們能更快速地找到資訊並提升學術成果。然而，對於資訊完整性的謹慎態度以及對於人工智慧使用方式透明度的要求，卻使這一期待有所收斂。
Key insights:
37% of researchers have used AI for work purposes
94% of researchers believe AI will help accelerate knowledge discovery
81% of researchers believe AI has the potential to erode critical thinking skills
在這個環節中，我們將著重於企業研究人員對於 AI (包括生成式 AI (GenAI))的態度，我們涵蓋了 AI 的吸引力、認知的影響力、對於他們和更廣泛的社會所帶來的利益、要自在使用利用這項技術的工具所需的透明程度，以及他們所看到的 AI 所帶來的挑戰。
Key insights:
96% believe it will help accelerate knowledge discovery
95% believe it will help increase their work efficiency
71% believe AI (including GenAI) will have a transformative or significant impact on their area of work
58% of those aware of AI have used it and 38% have used it for work purposes
At Elsevier, we bring together trusted content, human expertise and responsibly applied AI technologies to help researchers, educators and healthcare professionals worldwide advance discovery, innovation and patient care.
Researcher: Attitudes toward AI databook 打開新的分頁／視窗
Clinician of the Future: Attitudes toward AI databook 打開新的分頁／視窗
